The Passion of the Christ - A Lesson in Emotion

Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ was undeniablyviolence in the movie changes the viewers frame of
the most powerful movie of 2004. It shows the lastmind from that of a viewer to that of a participant in
few moments of Jesus', life in all of its gruesome detail.the action. It immerses the audience in the film. It is
Everything from the Agony in the Garden to theinconceivable for a person to sit in a chair watching
Scourging at the Pillar to Jesus being nailed to theThe Passion to be callous and scrutinizing while a real
cross was included in this detailed film. Although thisperson is being tortured before their very eyes. I call
movie may not be suitable for the young, the old, theJesus real because the actor, James Caviezel, is not
pregnant, or anyone with a heart condition, it is ansimply an actor playing a role. He is Jesus.
exceptional movie that definitely accomplishes MelThe realness of the characters can be contributed in
Gibson's goal of showing the world exactly how muchpart to the foreign languages utilized in the film. The
Jesus suffered to save us from sin, allowing us touse of the Aramaic, Latin, and Hebrew languages adds
enter into God's kingdom.to the plausibility of the film in that once words are
The Passion of the Christ is a thought provokingremoved from the equation, the only thing that is
movie. It captures the attention of anyone watching it,transmitted to the audience is emotion. If a picture is
and it enthralls them because of its power to makeworth a thousand words, then surely emotion is worth
people feel. The movie makes the audience feelten thousand. No single word or group of words can
sorrow, gratefulness, pity, anger, fear, and a host ofadequately explain how people feel. Words are flawed
other emotions. For example, the presence of Maryin that there are simply not enough to convey every
throughout the entire film gives the audience a senseidea and action. For this reason, I would argue that the
of sympathy for a mother that watches her son befilm would be just as powerful if not more powerful
tortured undeservingly, while the scenes of Jesus beingwithout the English subtitles. This would be perfectly
tortured invoke a sense of disbelief and fear. Momentsalright since the Passion story is so widely known.
like these make it impossible for a person watchingMel Gibson had to bring something to the table in order
The Passion to not feel anything. While watching theto give his movie that extra something that would
film, the audience hated the Jewish leaders for beingmake it great. Violence was not that extra something.
so ignorant and cruel. They hated Pilate for beingThe extra something is the acting. I never once
irresolute, but at the same time, they can appreciatedoubted the authenticity of the characters because
the stress of his position. They feel the sorrow of thenot only did they act their parts well, but they also
women that watch Jesus carry his cross. Theappeared to be Middle Eastern, and they spoke the
audience feels Jesus' pain as the Roman soldiers fliplanguage. Little touches like these make the movie
the cross over in order to flatten the backs of the nails.great.
Everyone jumped a little bit when Jesus died and theHowever great the movie may be, I cannot watch
devil let forth a blood curdling scream. The film does aThe Passion of the Christ without feeling somewhat
stellar job of making the audience feel the intensenessmanipulated. It is almost as if Mel Gibson is telling me,
of the Passion story.the viewer, what to believe. For example, Gibson
The key to the emotional manipulation lies in theshows the entire Jewish community in a terrible, evil
producer's power to make the film believable.light. Based on solely the movie, it is impossible for me
Something that sets this movie apart from otherto come to any other conclusion than that the
religious movies is the exclusion of the cheesiness thatcollective Jewish people are entirely responsible for the
tends to accompany other movies concerning spiritualdeath of my Savior. This is not unlike the Roman
topics. However, this is no ordinary, run-of-the-millsoldiers. In the movie, there is not one decent
religious movie. For starters, the film shows Jesus' fleshrank-and-file soldier. Although Mel Gibson portrays
being torn away as he is whipped within and inch ofPilate in a somewhat decent manner along with his
his life, only to be spat on, kicked, and crowned withright hand man, he makes the entire Roman culture out
thorns. It shows Jesus' shoulder being dislocated as theto be twisted, demented simpletons that like nothing
soldiers pull his arm to be nailed to the cross. Everybetter than torturing innocent people. This is unfair and
painful moment is included in this hard to watch film.definitely a flaw in the movie.
Even if you cannot identify with any of the charactersI called The Passion 'a lesson in emotion' because
or situations, surely you can identify with pain. Thisthroughout the course of the movie, the audience
self-identification makes the movie real, because thereexperiences intense emotions that they have never
is a relationship between the viewer and the movie. Itfelt before. By watching the Messiah carry his cross,
makes it come to life. This is where The Passionour cross up the hill, only to be nailed to it, they undergo
stands out against other religious films. It is believable,a learning experience. It is undoubtedly, 100% impossible
whereas others are not. Gibson dared to show whatto see Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ without
no other person would dare to show the world. Thisexperiencing a host of new and compelling emotions.